One of the most anticipated fights in the short history of mixed martial arts is Chuck Liddell versus Wanderlei Silva. Since 2003 this on again , off again match up has teased fans of both the UFC and Pride fighting championships, but now it looks like the fight may be on again.

UFC 79 on December 29th, 2007 is the rumored date for the fight to take place. The venue is in Las Vegas and the anticipation could not be any higher. It's true that both Wanderlei and Chuck are coming off back to back losses, but when you look at those losses and the quality of opposition it's clear that both of these guys are still at the top of their game.

Wanderlei Silva has fought an absolute who's who of 205lb mixed martial artists and won the vast majority of those battles. He's defeated Quinton Jackson twice in dominant fashion, defeated Dan Henderson, Ricardo Arona, Kazushi Sakuraba, but has yet to face the best of the "new" UFC. How will Wanderlei match up against Chuck Liddell, Keith Jardine, Houston Alexander or Forrest Griffin? I personally think that Wanderlei's strength, power and aggression is difficult for any fighter to deal with. He has a wild style that could either make it a very easy night for Chuck, or the worst night of Chuck Liddell's career.

Wanderlei likes to throw looping heavy punches, much like Chuck does, although Chuck's are just a touch straighter. The difference is in the clinch and ground game where I believe that Wanderlei Silva has a distinct advantage over Liddell. If Wanderlei gets Chuck in at close quarters it will be a very tough night for Liddell and three losses in a row may spell retirement for the "Ice Man".

Chuck Liddell needs no introduction to mixed martial arts and especially UFC fans. He has defeated two legends of the sport twice each. With big wins over Randy Couture and Tito Ortiz [url=http://www.cheapdiscountnfljerseys.com/news/109-cheap-seattle-seahawks-jers... Seahawks Women's Jersey , Chuck Liddell established himself as the UFC's top light heavyweight player for much of the last three years. However, Chuck is coming off of two losses. The first was a flash knockout loss to Quinton "Rampage" Jackson, with that loss the belt changed hands and Quinton became the new light heavyweight champ.

Chuck's second loss is more interesting. It came to Keith Jardine, now most MMA fans would argue that Jardine is strong and tough, but Chuck went into that fight as the favorite. The fight was close and the judges gave the decision to Jardine. There wasn't a single take down in the fight meaning that Chuck, formerly the most feared striker at 205lbs has been beaten twice in a row, both time on his feet.

In the fight with Wanderlei Silva, if Chuck can keep his composure and land some big straight shots inside of Wandy's wild looping punches he can make a short night's work. Chuck hits very hard, but most of his really hard shots seem to be looping overhand rights, I don't think those will be particularly effective against Wanderlei Silva; Chuck needs to throw straight. Also, Chuck Liddell should avoid the clinch with Wanderlei at all costs, if he needs more incentive he should watch Wandy's two fights with Quinton Jackson.

Let's all just hope that this fight happens as the rumors state on December 29th. I'm not picking a winner or a favorite in this fight, I just want to see it happen.
After Brexit earlier this year, UK may have to negotiate with other countries in EU on the immigration policies it will have for them. Theoretically , there are 2 competing models for immigration policies that countries use to regulate economic immigration.

Let us look into them and their pros and cons:

Point-based systems

According to these, migrants are admitted in a country according to a set of qualifications and criteria that involve education, language skills, work experience and age. In Canada and Australia, these systems were designed to choose permanent migrants who had a talent for citizenship.

Such systems have the advantage of being transparent and government can adjust the criteria as per evolving political and economic conditions in the country. They can become popular as public has a sense of control and the conditions are decided to promote economic success and long-term integration.

Are there any disadvantages here? The main drawback is that because employers are not involved it can mean that immigrants will arrive without any job offer and there is no assurance for them with regards to finding a job fitting their skills. Furthermore, points-based systems do not assess ‘soft skills’ that may mean a lot to employers. This can cause unemployment and integration issues.

Employer-led systems

Guided by demand, the systems trust employers to choose immigrants directly and this system can be used for permanent or temporary immigration.

Instead of trying to attract some people to boost the available labour pool, the employer –led system seeks to meet the needs in terms of business skills. In this way it is businesses and not government that determines the skills or experience that is valuable to them.

Ensuring that immigrants enter the labour market as soon as they become a part of the market is better for integration. These systems are usually accompanied by government rules that set the parameters for selection.

Immigration rules can be pretty complex and restrictive. For example, they can lay down language requirements, income levels or a qualifier to demonstrate that a certain job cannot be given to local workers.

As immigrants come to a country to do a certain job, their residence rights can be related to a specific job and as per the details of the system, they may have to exit from the country if they lose that job.

And what is the disadvantage of this system? Its criticism is that it ca. [url=http://www.cheapwholesalenfljerseysshop.us.com/]Cheap Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Cheap Jerseys China Wholesale Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Free Shipping Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale NFL Jerseys China Wholesale Soccer Jerseys From China Cheap Jerseys From China Cheap Jerseys From China