At the same time this unique and wise view of enlightenment is bound to be a mediocre view in the eyes of faith and even a confession of its own mediocrity; For the Enlightenment is such a view in that it knows nothing of the absolute essence or to put it another way it knows of the absolute essence only the perfectly ordinary truth that the absolute essence is nothing but an absolute essence; on the contrary it knows only of the finite things and rather it knows that the finite things are real things And that this knowledge of finite things that is of real things is the highest knowledge Ⅲ． The legitimate right to enlightenment Belief 12v Dc Motor High Torque Low Rpm has the right to oppose enlightenment which is a sacred right the right of absolute self-identity or pure thinking and the belief that it is treated by enlightenment is totally unfair and has no right; For the Enlightenment distorts all its links distorts them into something very different from what they really are in faith; and the Enlightenment which opposes faith and insists on its own truth has only the right of the world; For what the Enlightenment does unjustly what it reverses and changes is an unequal right which belongs to the nature of self-consciousness which is opposed to simple nature or thinking However since the right of enlightenment is the right of self-consciousness enlightenment will not be limited to claiming its own right so that the two spiritual rights can seem to confront each other but on the contrary it will claim its absolute right because self-consciousness is the negation of concepts and this negation is not only self-conscious but also interferes with its counterpart (consciousness); And since faith is a kind of consciousness faith will not be able to deny that enlightenment has its right 1．

Self-movement of the mind Because what the Enlightenment treats the belief consciousness is not the unique principle of the Enlightenment itself but the original principle of the belief consciousness itself Enlightenment is nothing more than the presentation to the belief consciousness of some of its own thoughts that are scattered and isolated without knowing it; enlightenment is nothing more than making the belief consciousness recall according to one of its own thought links those other thought links that it already has but that are always forgotten when it 24v Dc Motor With Gearbox thinks of this link Enlightenment shows itself to the consciousness of faith as pure knowledge by the fact that it can see the whole in a particular link that it can find the opposite associated with that link and that it can transform one into the other thus producing the negative nature and concept of the two links of thought Enlightenment thus appears to faith as a distortion and a lie because it reveals the anderssein of the links of faith; it therefore seems to make the links of faith something else directly different from what they are in their individuality;

But this other thing is also essential and is really something that the consciousness of faith has in itself but has not been remembered by the consciousness of faith and has been preserved in some other place; therefore this other thing is neither alien to the consciousness of belief Brushless Gear Motor nor can it be denied by it However although enlightenment reminds faith to pay attention to its own isolated and unconnected links it is also ignorant and unclear about itself It treats faith in a purely negative manner only because it excludes its content from its purity and regards its content as its own negative Therefore it does not know itself in this negation in the content of belief nor does it combine and connect the ideas it provides with the ideas it provides against


Because it does not recognize that what it condemns in faith is directly its own thought it is itself always in opposition to one another and it recognizes only one of the two links in particular it recognizes only the link opposed to faith at each time while it separates the other link from the former Just as faith does Therefore it does not unite the two to create a unity a concept of the two but rather the concept appears to it as it happens for itself in other words it only discovers the existing concept For the realization (movement) of pure consciousness is in essence precisely this first the pure consciousness itself of which the concept is the essence alienates itself into an absolute other denying itself (because the opposition of concepts is absolute) and then returns from this other to itself that is to say to its concept But Enlightenment is only this movement which is an unconscious activity of the pure concept which does reach its object that is to say itself but Parallel Shaft Gearbox which regards the object and itself as something else and which does not know the nature of the concept that is to say it does not know

The undifferentiated thing is the thing that absolutely divides itself Therefore pure knowledge is a conceptual force when it opposes belief because it is a movement that links the isolated links of belief consciousness together and because of this connection the contradiction between the links of belief appears Here lies the absolute right of pure knowledge to do violence to faith; but it is precisely in the fact that the consciousness of faith is itself a concept and that it recognizes the opposite that pure knowledge has found for it that knowledge can make this violence real and effective Pure knowledge then retains its right to oppose faith because it makes what is necessary for faith itself and what is already in faith itself valid in faith 2． A critique of the arguments of faith ichgearmotor.com

The complete look of your internet site is remarkable, not to mention the content material!
also visit my net web page -voip phone