Two years ago, the Canadian Soccer Association (CSA) was embroiled in a bitter governance struggle. Two opposing forces - the old guard, who wanted to maintain the status quo, and the reformers, who wanted to see the CSA adopt a more progressive, effective governance structure - were at an impasse. The media spotlight was shone on the problem, leading to a groundswell of support from across the country in favour of governance reform. In the end, the greater good prevailed, the old guard were outnumbered and the membership of the CSA voted in favour of change. The result of that struggle now sees the CSA being governed by a diverse, professionally-qualified, functional board of directors. They have done a tremendous amount of work behind the scenes, have empowered staff to do their jobs, and created a unique, inclusive strategic plan that will provide a blueprint for the development of the game in Canada for years to come. A key component of that strategic plan will be alignment of governance structures between the national and provincial/territorial organizations. It sounds complicated, but when it is put into context, it is really quite simple to understand. While the CSAs national governance structure is very much in order, the same cannot be said for the provincial associations, their respective district associations, nor for their respective clubs. A perfect example of this occurred last weekend in Ontario. The Ontario Soccer Association (OSA)s Board of Directors voted to reject a Request for Decision - RFD 2013-009 - that would have seen OSA-recognized non-club academies permitted to participate in the OSAs new standards-based, high-performance youth soccer league (the OPDL) next season. The request for decision was brought forward by the OSAs Technical Advisory Council (TAC), a group of experienced professionals with backgrounds in player development, coach education, high-performance and professional soccer, refereeing and administration. TAC was commissioned by the OSA to conceive and develop the OPDL, and to advise the OSA staff in making technical recommendations to its board of directors. The OSA board gave no explanation as to why it voted against the recommendations of the OSA technical staff and TAC - but it is not difficult to figure out. The vote to deny the RFD was motivated by petty politics, rather than what is in the best interest of player development. With a board composed of 21 district representatives and a seven-member Executive, the OSAs governance structure is fundamentally flawed. The same conflict of loyalty that plagued the CSA two years ago - where provincial association presidents on the CSA board sought mainly to further the interests of their respective provinces, rather than the greater interest of the game at a national level - now plagues the OSA. District representatives on the OSA board defend their own respective interests instead of working for the greater interest of what is best for the game across the province. This vote to deny RFD 2013-009 in Ontario is just one example of the governance problem; similar issues plague other provincial associations. So how does the CSA go about fixing this problem? The ideal solution would be the achievement of a consensus between the national and provincial levels on a consistent governance structure throughout the CSA: each Association would have the same basic structure, with a skill-set, professional board performing a strategic function and management/staff performing technical and program functions. This consensus approach would create the least amount of bad blood, and result in the maximum amount of buy-in by the provinces. An alternative approach is to mandate that each provincial association mirrors the CSAs national governance structure, or some kind of variation that is acceptable to the CSAs board of directors. The CSA board would be wise to consider this option, even while it might not be its first choice. Instituting parallel governance structures at the provincial level need not entail a fight like the one that occurred two years ago at the CSA. There isnt the same uncertainty surrounding the impact of governance reform: the provincial associations are aware of what kinds of changes would have to occur within their organizations. The challenge would be for the CSA to work with the provincial associations to craft unique solutions for each provincial/territorial association, according to the principles of good governance. Canadian soccer supporters would much rather hear stories of our national teams qualifying for World Cups, or of the steps being taken in player and coach development across the country. But governance impacts all of those things. We must continue to work towards implementing good governance structures at every level of the game across Canada - so that decisions like the one made in Ontario last weekend never happen again. . Thats when Vancouver rookie Cody Hodgson ensured the Oilers road woes would continue. Hodgson slipped a puck between the legs of goalie Devan Dubnyk to give the Canucks a 3-2 victory over Edmonton Tuesday night, handing the Oilers their sixth straight road loss. [url=http://www.nflofficialauthentic.com/nfl-jerseys/indianapolis-colts/anthony-... Castonzo Colts Jersey .5 million contract extension. The team announced the move via Twitter on Monday morning. . -- The Oklahoma City Barons entered Sundays game in the midst of a battle for playoff positioning. [url=http://www.nflofficialauthentic.com/nfl-jerseys/minnesota-vikings/jerick-mc... McKinnon Vikings Jersey . Ellis started his Dallas career with 32 points, Nowitzki scored 24 and the Mavericks spoiled Mike Budenholzers coaching debut with a 118-109 victory over the Atlanta Hawks on Wednesday night. (Sports Network) - The Atlanta Hawks hope to seize control of their Eastern Conference quarterfinals set with Orlando on Easter Sunday when the two teams meet in Game 4 at Philips Arena. The Hawks are a leg up in the series after Jamal Crawford scored 12 of his 23 points in a chippy fourth quarter on Friday, including a three-pointer off the backboard in the final seconds, as Atlanta held on for an 88-84 victory over Orlando to take a 2-1 lead in the set. I didnt call bank. I think the bank is closed right now, Crawford said of his big shot. Crawford played nearly 29 minutes off the bench and sparked a key run during the fourth, helping the Hawks lock down the pivotal Game 3. Joe Johnson added 21 points, Josh Smith scored 15 with 10 rebounds and Al Horford had 13 points. We wanted to come home and really establish ourselves, particularly in the first [game], said Hawks head coach Larry Drew. We thought that coming into the game that they were going to give us their best shot, and I thought they did. Dwight Howard collected 21 points and 15 rebounds for the Magic, while Jameer Nelson also had a double-double with 13 points and 10 assists. I thought we played with much more energy in the second half, and that got us back into it, Magic coach Stan Van Gundy said. But this is the playoffs and you cant play 24 minutes of defense. Orlando dressed 11 players with backup guard Chris Duhon sitting because of a sprained left ankle. Both teamss will be shorthanded for Game 4 on Sunday after an altercation with 2:22 remaining led to the ejections of Magic guard Jason Richardson and Hawks center Zaza Pachulia for fighting, following a hard foul by Pachulia on Howard.dddddddddddd Howard also was given a technical following video review. Pachulia and Richardson were both suspended for Game 4 on Friday by the NBA. The Magic shot just 8-for-28 on three-pointers in Game 3, with Hedo Turkoglu hitting just one of his six tries. Orlandos big gun is now only 3-for-17 in the series from long range. Hes not shooting the ball well, so he ends up taking bad shots, Van Gundy said. He gets more hesitant, then its a vicious cycle that weve got to get him out of. Clearly, we need him to shoot the ball a lot better and to make better decisions on when to shoot it. In last years playoffs against Atlanta, the Magic recorded the largest victory margin in a four-game sweep in NBA playoff history, winning the series by a total of 101 points. The Hawks lost all four contests in the set by an average of over 25 points per contest and the closest they ever came in the series was a 98-84 setback in Game 4. The two teams have met twice in the postseason previously, last years shellacking by Orlando along with a 4-1 Magic win in the 1995-96 Eastern Conference semifinals. Overall, the Magic are now 9-3 versus the Hawks in the playoffs. Game 5 of the set will be back in Orlando on Tuesday. cheap jerseys wholesale jerseys ' ' '